Search for: "SOUTHERN TALC COMPANY"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
Company representatives at the time rebutted the study, suggesting there was no definitive link between cosmetic-grade talc and cancer. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 12:08 pm
Indeed, manufacturing giant Johnson & Johnson is currently facing almost 5,000 lawsuits brought by women who have developed various types of cancer after years of consistent use of the company’s talc-based baby powder product. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Johnson & Johnson moved for summary judgment based on its expert testimony that the company’s talcum powder and talc did not contain asbestos. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:46 am
District Court, Southern District of Florida, under Judge Anuraag Singhal. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 4:18 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York along with the consolidated claims of three other ANDA applicants. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
Metro area, including Arlington, Fredericksburg, Woodbridge, Virginia, and throughout Northern Virginia, as well as Southern Maryland. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Southern African Studies 835, 838 (2009) (citing to South African National Archives, Pretoria, F 33\671, Supplementary Confidential Report of the Departmental Committee of Enquiry into the Relation between Silicosis and Pulmonary Disability. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 2:35 pm
In additional to the Bill Barrett Corporation lawsuit, a merger objection lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York against American Finance Trust, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in connection with the company’s proposed merger into Retail Centers of America. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
., a Canadian chrysotile mining company for its supply to the factory. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:28 pm
” In January, the Southern District of New York followed the overwhelming number of courts that dismissed “vanilla” claims throughout 2021. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
The authors also point to a talc ovarian cancer case as exemplifying the use of clinical data to supplement a relative risk below two.[9] The cited case, however, involved expert witnesses who claimed a relative risk greater than two for the tortogen, and who failed to show how clinical information (such as the presence of talc in ovarian tissue) made the claimant any more likely to have had a cancer caused by talc. [read post]
